Case study
Sheffield Substation 25 MVA Transformer Post-Fault Testing and HV Withstand
Talk to an engineer: 1300 730 499 or service@megavar.com.au
- Client
- TasNetworks
- Location
- Sheffield Substation, north-west Tasmania, TAS
- Voltage
- 110 kV and 22 kV
- Asset Type
- 1 x 110/22 kV 25 MVA power transformer (T5)
- Project Type
- Post-fault diagnostic testing and HV withstand (applied voltage) testing
- Duration
- Two site visits: post-fault diagnostic testing 8 to 9 February 2024; HV withstand testing 22 May 2024
- Megavar Scope
- Post-fault transformer diagnostics (SFRA, dielectric response, dissipation factor and capacitance, bushings, ratio, impedance, winding resistance, tap changer); 300 kV resonant applied voltage test on both windings; insulation resistance before and after; test reports with findings and recommendations
Overview
Sheffield Substation is a TasNetworks 110/22 kV substation in north-west Tasmania. Its T5 transformer is a 110/22 kV, 25 MVA unit built by Wilson Transformer Company and installed in 2018. Megavar carried out its site acceptance tests in December 2018.
In early 2024, after a lightning strike, T5 began producing gas. TasNetworks needed to know whether the transformer could safely stay in service or was at risk of failure. TasNetworks engaged Megavar directly for two stages of work: a full set of post-fault diagnostic tests in February 2024, then an applied voltage (HV withstand) test with Megavar’s 300 kV resonant test system in May 2024.
Because Megavar had tested the same transformer at commissioning, the post-fault results could be compared against Megavar’s own 2018 baseline, not just the factory test sheet.
Scope of Work
- Sweep frequency response analysis (SFRA) on all three phases at taps 1, 9, 12 and 23, compared with the 2018 site acceptance traces
- Dielectric frequency response of the main HV to LV insulation, to assess moisture
- Winding dissipation factor and capacitance on the 110 kV and 22 kV windings
- Dissipation factor and capacitance of the four 110 kV bushings (C1 and C2)
- Short-circuit impedance, voltage ratio and phase relationship on all 23 taps, winding excitation current and magnetic balance
- Winding resistance on every tap, a three-phase on-load tap changer scan and tap changer motor current
- Insulation resistance and polarisation index on the windings, core, frame and bushings
- Applied voltage (HV withstand) test on 22 May 2024: 184 kV on the 110 kV winding and 40 kV on the 22 kV winding, each for 60 seconds at resonant frequency, set at 80 per cent of the factory test levels
- Insulation resistance before and after the withstand test
- Inspection and Test Plan, Safe Work Method Statement, and test reports with findings and recommendations
Equipment Tested
- 1 x 110/22 kV 25 MVA power transformer T5 (Wilson Transformer Company, 2018, YNyn0, ONAF)
- 23-position on-load tap changer and drive motor
- 4 x ABB GSA123-OA 110 kV bushings (three phases and neutral)
Megavar Test Equipment Deployed
- Megavar 300 kV resonant HV test set
- OMICRON TESTRANO 600 three-phase transformer test system
- OMICRON CP TD1 for dissipation factor and capacitance
- OMICRON FRAnalyzer sweep frequency response analyser
- Megger IDAX dielectric response analyser
- Megger MIT515 5 kV insulation resistance tester
Team: Each site visit was carried out by a two-person Megavar test team, with the results reviewed by a senior Megavar test engineer before the report was issued.
Challenges and Approach
The question was not simply whether T5 would pass a set of tests. It was whether TasNetworks could keep a gassing transformer in service with confidence. Megavar split the work into two steps so the second could be judged on the results of the first.
The February diagnostic tests looked for mechanical and insulation damage without stressing the insulation. Short-circuit impedance matched the nameplate to within 0.02 percentage points on taps 1, 8 and 23. Ratio errors were 0.06 per cent or less on all 23 taps. The dielectric response put moisture in the main insulation at 0.8 per cent. The SFRA traces followed the same pattern as the 2018 traces, with minor deviations in the core region and around internal connections; Megavar noted these could come from residual magnetism or the energised 110 kV yard around the transformer, and recommended the manufacturer review the traces. The dissipation factor of the 22 kV winding to tank had risen from 0.29 per cent in 2018 to 0.49 per cent.
With no sign of winding movement, the remaining question was whether the insulation would still withstand a voltage well above operating stress. That is what an applied voltage test proves. Megavar set the levels at 80 per cent of the factory test voltages, the guide AS/NZS 60076.3 gives for insulation that has been in service, so the test would prove the insulation without over-stressing a transformer TasNetworks wanted to keep.
A resonant test system was used because it reaches the 184 kV needed on the 110 kV winding from a small site supply, and because resonance collapses immediately if the insulation breaks down, which limits damage to the transformer under test.
Outcomes
T5 passed both applied voltage tests: 185 kV on the 110 kV winding at 77 Hz, and 40.5 kV on the 22 kV winding at 61 Hz, each held for 60 seconds. Insulation resistance was effectively unchanged by the test: 26.5 GΩ before and 24.5 GΩ after on the 110 kV winding, and 15.2 GΩ before and 14.5 GΩ after on the 22 kV winding.
During the first application on the 22 kV winding the test team heard an acoustic discharge inside the tank. They repeated the test twice more and the discharge did not recur. Megavar reported it and recommended further oil sampling and monitoring, giving TasNetworks a clear basis for keeping T5 in service under closer watch.
T5 passed and stayed in service. For more on the methods used, see resonant hipot testing, transformer testing services, the hipot testing guide and the SFRA testing guide.
Need High Voltage Testing or Equipment?
Tell us what you need and when, and we will come back with availability and pricing.
Get In TouchFAQ
Frequently Asked Questions
When should a power transformer be HV withstand tested after a fault?
A withstand test is worth doing when a transformer has been through an event that may have damaged its insulation, such as a lightning strike, a through-fault or gassing shown by dissolved gas analysis, and the owner wants to keep it in service. Diagnostic tests such as SFRA, dissipation factor and dielectric response come first, because they show winding movement and insulation condition without stressing the insulation. The withstand test then proves the insulation still holds a voltage well above operating stress.
What test voltage is used for a field withstand test on a transformer that has been in service?
Field withstand tests on transformers that have been in service are normally applied at a reduced level, typically 80 per cent of the original factory test voltage, which AS/NZS 60076.3:2017 gives as the guide for insulation that has been in service. At Sheffield that meant 184 kV on the 110 kV winding and 40 kV on the 22 kV winding, each for 60 seconds.
Why use a resonant test system for a transformer withstand test?
A series resonant system tunes to the capacitance of the transformer and reaches high test voltages from a small site supply, and resonance collapses instantly if the insulation breaks down, which limits damage to the asset. Megavar’s 300 kV and 500 kV resonant systems are supplied with Megavar’s test team; they are not available for dry hire.
Request a quote
Tell us about the job
An engineer replies by the end of the next business day (Monday to Friday, 8:30 am to 5:00 pm). Scope still forming? Send what you have. Hiring equipment? Use the equipment hire pages or email rentals@megavar.com.au.
Talk to us now
1300 730 499service@megavar.com.auHire: rentals@megavar.com.auMonday to Friday, 8:30 am to 5:00 pmTrusted by top enterprises for exceptional results



Engineers Australia-wide Request a quote